Encryption and the General Public | CyberSecuritySpeak

Racepoint Global

Many commentators have expressed their concern for the lack of skills in the cyber security sector. In a previous blogpost, we highlighted that there are not enough people with the necessary technical skills to meet market demand and these vacant positions. This digital skills gap is now also showing up in other areas, at a time when fundamental and important questions around how we use the internet and technology are coming to the surface.

As a result, there is a huge need for the general public to understand a number of crucial technological terms. Without a grasp of these important terms, vital conversations around the future of technology and how we will use it in the future will become convoluted and vague. One area where this is rapidly coming to a head is around the debate about encryption.

Following the recent shocking attacks in London’s Westminster, the UK Home Secretary Amber Rudd attacked tech firms such as WhatsApp for providing “a secret place for terrorists to communicate with each other.” She then went on to say, “we need to make sure that our intelligence services have the ability to get into situations like encrypted WhatsApp,” when she appeared on BBC One’s Andrew Marr Show last weekend.

Consequently, the Home Secretary’s comments have ignited fresh debate over encryption. With some people clearly concerned that encrypted messaging services could create places for criminals to hide, and others worried about their privacy being at risk and “backdoors” being created that could be exploited by criminals and terrorists themselves. It is therefore important that an educated and constructive conversation is held and both views are correctly heard.

As more and more of these important areas come up for discussion around the future of how we use and interact with the internet, it is vital that they are debated on a level where technological nuances are understood by both sides. Never has communication about technology been so important.


News Round-up

Computer Weekly

Non-malware attacks pose bigger threat than malicious software

According to 93% of more than 400 cyber security researchers polled by security firm Carbon Black, non-malware attacks pose a greater risk to business than commodity malware.


DDoS attacks making hackers a 95% profit margin

Research by Kapersky has revealed that a DDoS attack can cost a hacker just $7 an hour, with a profit margin of around 95%.

Infosecurity Magazine

Experts Hit Back at Rudd’s ‘Cheap’ WhatsApp Shot

Rights groups, former military bosses and law enforcers have dismissed the home secretary’s attack on end-to-end encryption.

SC Magazine

President Trump’s microwave and other unnecessary IoT distractions

Davey Winder discusses the security threat of IoT devices.

The Register

Encryp-xit: Europe will go all in for crypto backdoors in June

European politicians have urged EU Justice Comissioner Věra Jourová announces that the European Commission will in June push for backdoor access to encryption used by apps.


If you would like to hear more from the Cyber Security team please email cybersecurityspeak@racepointglobal.com